Case study Companies

Aerospace: how to secure ESG reporting at scale

Faced with accelerating climate requirements, the aerospace sector no longer has only to announce its transition: it must demonstrate the credibility of that transition to win over its prime contractors.

Three key takeaways

  • Structuring ESG data is becoming essential to steering the decarbonization pathways that prime contractors and regulators expect.
  • Industrializing the collection of Scope 3 data is emerging as a central issue in a supply chain under growing pressure to be transparent.
  • Data quality is no longer just a matter of compliance: it becomes a direct lever for sustainable performance, both operationally and commercially.

In this context, a multi-activity aerospace group, involved in production, maintenance (MRO), and an international supply chain, faced a defining challenge: making a CSR reporting process that had become both strategic and particularly complex to consolidate more reliable.

The challenge: making ESG data reliable and industrialized

In a sector where decarbonizing air transport is now a strategic priority, companies must be able to demonstrate tangible, verifiable progress, in particular on their emissions and across their entire value chain.

For this group, the first difficulty lay in fragmented data. ESG information was scattered across different tools, different sites, and different activities, with no common framework to ensure its consistency. Consolidation took up a great deal of time and remained exposed to the risk of errors, limiting confidence in the indicators produced.

This complexity was compounded by the weight of their Scope 3 emissions. Supplier data, which has become essential in assessing climate performance, was collected through loosely formalized processes, often based on one-off exchanges that were hard to use over time. Each new request from clients or auditors meant tedious manual rework.

Finally, the diversity of the group's activities was a further obstacle. The relatively structured data from production coexisted with much more diffuse information on the maintenance and logistics side. Without a common framework, the company struggled to get a consolidated view of its ESG performance and to set its actions on a coherent pathway.

In an environment where prime contractor requirements now include specific ESG criteria and directly determine access to markets, this situation was no longer sustainable.

BlueKanGo for CSR harmonized on a global scale

To address these challenges, the group undertook a thorough transformation of its CSR reporting system, relying on the BlueKanGo platform. The ambition was clear: to move from scattered collection to a genuine system for steering ESG performance.

The first step was to put in place a common framework, able to cover all the company's activities while respecting their specifics. The data from production sites, maintenance activities, and the supply chain was thus gradually brought into a single structuring foundation.

This harmonization work made it possible to standardize indicators, make the collection processes more reliable, and strengthen the traceability of information. In parallel, the methods for collecting supplier data were formalized to secure the quality of Scope 3 data and make it easier to reuse in response to client or regulatory requests.

The model rests on a decentralized organization, in which each entity remains responsible for entering its own data while operating within a common framework that ensures consistency. Dashboards then make it possible to analyze performance at various levels, from site to group, but above all to turn the data into a genuine decision-support tool.

The benefits: ensuring data is turned into a steering lever

Transforming CSR reporting produced quick, structuring effects.

The first change concerns data reliability. Information is now better documented, kept over time, and readily available for audits, ESG questionnaires, or regulatory obligations, strengthening the company's credibility with its stakeholders.

The teams also noted significant time savings. Reducing re-entry and structuring the collection processes helps limit the administrative burden and refocus efforts on analysis and action.

Beyond these operational gains, the company now has a genuine steering lever. Consolidating the data makes it easier to identify areas for improvement, particularly in reducing emissions and optimizing resources, in line with the sector's expectations.

The quality of the reporting is a tangible competitive advantage. By being able to provide reliable, traceable, and readily available data, the group strengthens its ability to meet prime contractor requirements, secure its compliance, and position itself sustainably in its markets.